Subject: Resolving local host names with SAMBA on Amiga with MiamiDX
The release of the popular Coffin Amiga OS image for V4, and its subsequent migration to MiSTer - has caused more interest in using SAMBA (SMB) on Amiga to move files from machine to machine. SAMBA on the Amiga has some limitations (the server you are connecting to must be a SMB V1 compliant machine, and modern Windows machines require SMB V2 by default). It is easy to set up your MiSTer as a SMB V1 machine as a file-share for other Amigas or a V4, and many NAS devices support SMB V1 by default or can also be easily configured to do so.
A reoccurring issue I hear people having is that SAMBA on their FPGA Amiga will not resolve SAMBA host file servers they know are on their network, and know are on the same subnet as their SAMBA capable Amiga. If you're using Coffin and MiamiDX (which you should be doing, Roadshow is priced too high and AmiTCP has its own set of issues,) the fix is pretty simple. Credit for reminding me about this goes to Eric Gustafson.
In Coffin, MiamiDX tends to run iconized and hidden beneath the task bar. The easiest way to bring it up in my experience is to go to Network on the top task-bar in Coffin and select "Online".
With MiamiDX still the active application, go to the Workbench top menu task bar, and select "Settings/save" to save your updated configuration.
Subject: Reddit Conversation on CRT/LCDs and Refresh Frequencies for Retro Gaming
Subject: The History of the CFRP Game
Like many gamers of my generation - my introduction to the world of Advanced Dungeons and Dragons happened at my local GEMCO. The genre of High Fantasy had been "a thing" among the generation immediately previous to mine - embraced by Led Zepplin and an army of stoners scrawling, "Frodo Lives!" graffiti on their college campuses for at least a decade before that, but TSR and GEMCO were about to bring epic High Fantasy into the mainstream consciousness.
Previously, nothing quite like AD&D existed in the mainstream consciousness. Medieval themes were relegated to princesses in towers and valiant Knights on brave white steeds dispatching dragons with a lance. Thundarr the Barbarian was possibly the closest thing my generation had been exposed to - but this was more of a Gamma World/Planet of the Apes post-apocalyptic genre thing. That was a genre that was huge from the late 60s to the late 70s - at which point the Star Wars Space Opera was replacing it as the favorite franchise trope in media and entertainment.
As a 9 year old, my original encounter with the 1st generation AD&D Monster Manual was an amazing event. I was an avid reader, and when I opened the pages of this book in the toy section my mind was blown. I didn't even realize it was part of the rules for a game - I just knew I held a magical tome, an encyclopedia of a mind-blowing assortment of monster descriptions with their stats and vivid descriptions. It lit my imagination on fire.
Around this same time, a new and emerging type of entertainment was starting to explode. The video game, both the "arcade console," and the "home console," (and to a lesser extent, among the very fortunate, the home computer,) were creating the first generation of children spending hours at a time planted in front of a screen blowing their allowance a quarter at a time to experience virtual realities.
Due largely to limitations in the technology of the time, and the parallel development Star Wars as the Biggest Thing In The World - the vast majority of those games involved Science Fiction themes. You could take control of a spacecraft and avoid asteroids, defend your base or earth from invading aliens, or go where no man had ever gone before all day long.
What you couldn't do was enter a dark dungeon teeming with orcs and goblins and beholders in search of plunder and treasure.
The desire for this type game was palpable among my friends and I. Occasionally there would be an arcade title like "Warrior" - a vector graphics game where two knights battled with swords gladiator-style near open pits. For some reason these titles were rare and mechanically unreliable - frequently out-of-order. Much as depicted in Toy Story, the Cowboy was on his way out, and the Space Ranger was on his way in, and somewhere in between, overlooked, was the band of sell-sword mercenaries looking to make a fortune while also becoming legends of the realm by vanquishing some great evil menace (and maybe robbing some graves in the process.)
The guys writing the games had all toked many bongs while listening to The Misty Mountains and reading Lord of the Rings - but their bosses, the guys in suits who approved projects - they were from a different generation. Their vision of Middle Ages fantasy adventure was firmly this:
|These were not the droids we were looking for|
If you ask people the history of computer fantasy adventure games, you'll get a lot of disagreement on what the "first" computer Fantasy adventure/rpg games were. Rogue and Adventure tend to be popular choices. The problem with these earliest attempts is they were almost exclusively played on college mainframe computers by students and faculty that were already a niche group involved in "pen and paper" gaming too. There was no wide, mainstream consumer access to these titles - and for the most part, only those in academia had opportunity and access to experience these games. The games were crude and primitive, and did not have massive commercial appeal. In my mind - they don't count.
|This was what you got, and you were happy with it.|
One early obstacle to these type of adventure games was that you really couldn't just pick up the game and play it - learning the rules quickly by trial and error. In a world of games like Space Invaders, Asteroids and Pac Man - adventure games required you to read and comprehend some fairly complex rule sets in order to understand the goal and how to succeed. There were no "in-game" tutorials and you couldn't just hop online and watch a Lets Play or read a walkthru.
I think the earliest game that brought the framework of what would develop into FRP and Adventure games was actually 1979's Atari 2600 "Superman" cartridge. Significantly, this was a one player game, with a quest completed by collecting items randomly scattered in a number of different "rooms" or "scenes" that depicted the cities and subways of Metropolis. There were enemies and obstacles that could set you back, there were side-quests (saving Lois Lane from Lex Luther), and you could change identities. Fundamentally, Skyrim operates on an engine that isn't tremendously different than the engine Superman introduced in the 70's.
Superman wins as the earliest attempt to bring a FRP game to video-gaming on a technicality. It is built on the engine for a game that was started before but released after Superman - a game which was arguably the first game on any home console to deliver a very primitive experience of the high fantasy Dungeons and Dragons FRP genre.
There are 3 castles, gold, white and black, there are a yellow, red and green dragon most often described as giant ducks, a sword that looks like an arrow and your valiant knight is a block. There is a bat that steals things from you (and sometimes carries the dragons around), and keys. As a 10 year old in 1980, I played Atari 2600 Adventure obsessively with my friend. Adventure is also notable as the first game to have a secret Easter Egg included. A magic invisible dot that revealed a hidden room with the programmer's name inside it - snuck by the "suits" at Atari who would not credit the programmers who designed Atari games. Like Superman, it offered hours of play, multiple different difficulty levels. Once mastered, it was like a bicycle - I can still complete level 3 without a reset after 5 or 10 minutes of warming up, over 40 years later.
|Pictured: Green Duck, sword and noble hero|
Here we should also mention Atari's Haunted House. Set in a multi-floor Victorian mansion infested with ghosts, winds that blow out the candle which is your only source of light, and other challenges, it was built on a similar game mechanic to both Superman and Adventure. Instead of a square, your avatar had been upgraded to a pair of eyeballs roaming in terror through the dark halls of the mansion, trying to gather and re-assemble the 3 scattered pieces of an urn.
Possibly the most underappreciated early CFRP game came 2 years later, in 1982 when a company named "Starpath/Arcadia" released a peripheral called the Supercharger for the Atari 2600.
This peripheral upgraded the 2600 to 6kb (up from 128 bytes) of ram with relatively high resolution graphics. If development of new hardware cycles hadn't been so rapid and the video game crash imminent - it would have been a far more popular peripheral for the Atari 2600. It loaded games from tape-cassettes - something at this point still relegated to home computer systems which were rare and generally incredibly expensive. Commodore was about to blow the doors off this barrier to entry, but that was still a ways off.
Dragonstomper was arguably the first, most authentic and most epic fantasy role playing video game to arrive to market at that time. It really got the atmosphere right. The game starts in an overhead map featuring castles, temples, lakes, and forests. Monsters inhabit the countryside, often lurking near particular features. Dispatching them gains you treasures and plunder. Items can enhance or decrease your stats (Strength, Dexterity and Hit Points).
|The monster selection was sometimes anticlimactic|
The goal is to amass enough wealth, strength and treasures (including papers that allow safe passage across a brdige) to enter a village. There you can stock up on an inventory of supplies and hirelings, at which point you venture on to the third segment, a dragon's cave full of traps eventually leading to an encounter with the titular Dragon you intend to stomp. While Ultima I had been available since 1981 on the Apple II - Richard Garriott's first two games were in many ways far less realized as a CFRP game than Dragonstomper. The price of an Atari 2600 and a Supercharger was a fraction of the cost of a single peripheral on the home PCs of the time. Dragonstomper was a more fully executed and far more accessible early CFRP in the spirit of AD&D than either Ultima I or II. There is no time travel, are no energy weapons, no space-ships to be found in Dragonstomper. But the general design of Dragonstomper shares much with Ultima III, where Lord British found his stride with his seminal Computer FRP franchise.
The elements all come together in this game in a way that console games wouldn't match until much later when the NES arrived on US soil. By then, the landscape had changed with computer gaming becoming accessible and dominant. The NES FRP titles almost all had a distinctly Japanese anime/kawaii fairy-tale style unlike the more grittier, dramatic and realistic style of US games. Dragonstomper was the closest that the first wave of computer gaming ever got to an affordable, accessible computerized Fantasy Role Playing game, and it would be a long time after until the C-64 made this a reality for people of modest income again.
It is worth noting that around the same time that Dragonstomper was released, Pitfall on the 2600 and Advance Dungeons & Dragons became available for the Intellivision. The Intellivision was always an odd console that Mattel didn't quite know who to market to, and their AD&D is an interesting game, but more like Hunt the Wumpus on the TI99/4A than like Adventure or Dragonstomper. Pitfall is one of the earliest "platformer" games, with running, jumping and climbing from screen to screen to collect items for a score - but it is also an early "adventure" game in that it is a fairly open world, with different rooms, and a clear quest goal that can be completed, as opposed to just playing indefinitely until you ran out of lives.
Around this time, two other titles showed up in my life. Venture was an arcade game by Exidy. There was a little neighborhood market in my neighborhood that had this arcade cabinet for a short while. When it worked, it was an incredible game. Unfortunately the hardware was notoriously fickle and it spent most of its time out-of-order, before finally the owner replaced it with a more reliable game. Eventually Coleco would license the title for their Colecovision console and I'd get to play the game to my heart's content. In Venture, you had gone from being represented by a square or a dot to being a smiley face holding a bow, chased through the hallways of a dungeon inhabited by giant troll-like monsters to enter rooms of diabolical design inhabited by a variety of dungeon dwelling enemies including skeletons, goblins, snakes and griffons. It was an arcade game with no quest and endlessly increasing difficulty. The goal was to retrieve as much treasure as possible before the game became so difficult it consumed all of your lives.
The more interesting title on the Colecovision was the Epyx title, "Gateway to Apshai". This dungeon crawler started you off with low stats and lightly equipped. Exploring the maze-like dungeon revealed more and more of its shape as you moved forward, and encounters with monsters gave you treasure, score, and better equipment. At the end of each level, you could upgrade your stats, improving your abilities as the monsters encountered grew more difficult to dispatch. It was a hybrid between the arcade-scorer gameplay mechanics of Venture and the more FRP quest-based approach with persistent elements like an inventory of titles like Dragonstomper. Apshai was a port of a game previously available on home PCs, but its faithful arrival on a home console announced that consoles were beginning to deliver PC style gaming experiences on a far more affordable budget.
Around this time, just as things were getting good, the video-game crash occurred. It caused major upheaval and disruption to the video game industry, with some analysts predicting that video games were just a fad and had lived out their moment.
They were wrong, of course. On the other side, the Commodore 64 and Nintendo NES would change the world. Older first generation gamers who had cut their teeth on domestic gaming systems tended to gravitate toward the C=64, which had become nearly as affordable as consoles had been, with software and hardware easily accessible at your local Gemco or Toys R Us instead of difficult to find and intimidating computer specialty stores or mail-order.
A second generation of younger gamers would move on quickly from Super Mario Bros. to Legend of Zelda. There is a generational divide in gaming there that still exists to this day, with a legion of younger gamers who cut their teeth on d-pads and cute, kid-friendly Nintendo titles. There is cross-over between both generations of gamers - but as a general rule, older gamers prefer grittier, more realistic "hardcore" gaming and later gamers are far more fond of friendly, stylized gaming with an emphasis on cute, cartoon style graphics and themes.
The affordable cost and department store availability of the Commodore 64 suddenly made more complex ports of older Atari and Apple computer FRP games available to a previously inaccessible market. Though those titles had existed for much longer, very few gamers had access to them because of the prohibitive cost of the systems they ran on. The Ultima series owes much of its status as the first fully realized commercially successful CFRP to the success of the Commodore 64.
Shortly after the explosion of affordable home computers after the crash, a promising company called Electronic Arts released a seminal title that for the first time reimagined the formula that arguable had been prototyped with Dragonstomper and was made the default for CFRP gaming with the Ultima series.
1985's Bards Tale I was in some ways more limited in scope than the Ultima series, containing you inside the walls of a single city under siege by evil monsters rather than a world map full of cities to travel to and explore. Inside this city were various dungeons, all leading to a confrontation with the source of the evil infestation - a predictable rogue wizard. But the level of emersion in this 1st person, "pseudo-3D" presented dungeon crawler was unprecedented. Borrowing heavily on the game mechanics of Ultima III (so much so that some versions could import your characters from Ultima III into Bards Tale,) which in turn itself copied AD&D concepts and ideas - Bards Tale had brought the CFRP game genre into the mainstream. The early levels were mercilessly hard. It is my opinion that most gamers who bought the title didn't get past level 3 or 4 without rage-quitting, cheating using an editor, or finding out the trick to grinding on a specific monster encounter until they were high enough level to make fleeting expeditions into the first 2 levels of the first dungeon. It is really a wonder that The Bard's Tale didn't kill the fledgling genre just as it began to mature. The arrival of the unprecedented graphics capabilities of the Amiga was something EA quickly leveraged, and the Amiga version of Bards Tale had no peers in graphics experience at the time. Coupled with an encounter engine that did play a lot like a tabletop version of AD&D, while Bards Tale 1 was an imperfect game - it laid the foundation for a franchise that still does well today. Eventually the SSI AD&D "Gold Box" titled would appear. These would be the first licensed AD&D CFRP titles that faithfully applied the official AD&D rules and allowed character progression from title to title in the series.
From 1979 until 1985 may not sound like that long of a time, but for those who wanted to experience the dungeon adventures of the AD&D FRP game but did not have access to a circle of friends smart enough to puzzle out the complex and arcane rules of the pen and paper game, it was an eternity of waiting for an industry to catch up with the tastes of its audience.
Subject: A Vegan, a Crossfitter and a Redditor... (BMW M4 Grill)
...who hates the new grill on the BMW M4/M3 all walk into a bar. I only know because they told everyone there in the first 5 minutes.
The new BMW kidney grill is controversial.
My first BMW was an e36 328i saloon, followed by an e30 325iC.
Subject: BMW M235i Android Auto MMI Upgrade Review
Some 2016 head units, on some models could be upgraded to add CarPlay and Android - many more could not. If you're in "Club Could Not" you probably already know it by now. In general, the technical details come down to this - in-car Information/Entertainment consoles have become almost as much a central part of your vehicle's digital brain as the ECU that controls the engine and other systems. Car companies aren't really very good at this, either intentionally or because it isn't their core business. It certainly helps sell new models when you simply can't get a factory head unit with the newest features at any price.
Several companies have stepped in to fill this void with aftermarket solutions. There are two ways you can do this, and both have their plus and minuses. One solution is a replacement for your factory LCD that has a built in Android Carplay system. These tend to be pricey. You're basically pulling out your factory LCD display and replacing it with an Android touchscreen tablet made to fit where the factory LCD was. Your factory head unit hooks into this LCD directly and can pass its video through to the LCD, allowing you to maintain factory information/entertain center functions. I also don't trust off-brand Chinese tablets to be high quality and have my doubts that they're using high quality components in these devices, either.
A generally less expensive way is to put in an "MMI" (multimedia interface) box. This is a small box that also contains a stand alone ARM processor and RAM memory. It sits between your factory head unit, which remains unmodified, and the factory LCD, much the same way that a piggy-back ECU tune box sits between the factory ECU and the engine. It also can pass the unmodified factory head unit to the LCD, but your Android Auto connects to the MMI itself, which then outputs from the MMI to the LCD. The end net result is very similar in either case.
I'm sure Bimmertech would assure you that for $799 you're getting their world class domestic support, a network of local installation techs across the country, and a better, more polished custom interface.
In fact, until recently, you could frequently download and flash one company's firmware onto another company's MMI unit - because the hardware was the exact same thing. I'm sure Bimmertech wasn't happy with people buying cheaper units from Chinese vendors and then flashing their firmware onto them. Now the MMI units have a vendor specific pin code and trying to cross-flash your MMI with a different vendor's firmware will brick your device.
I decided to go with Carlinkit - a Chinese company that offers virtually the same MMI for around $270. Shipping via DHL was surprisingly fast and the MMI arrived less than a week later.
Both companies make the same promises on features. Wired and wireless (with the right phone and Android 11 or higher) Android Auto and Apple Carplay, integration with factory steering controls, mic, and iDrive controller, access to original iDrive interface and features including parking assist and backup camera, wired and wireless screen mirroring, and other features. If there is a difference other than the vendor's firmware, I haven't been able to discover what it is. If anyone knows, please leave a message in the comments.
I have a friend who is a huge car buff and who has a huge garage with A/C at his house. His garage easily fits a McLaren, a drag modified C7 Vette, and a classic Camaro, along with room to spare for a kitchen and entertainment area, with an RV garage adjoining. His Vette is an unrecognizable monster with a parachute on the end that does the 1/4 mile in under 9 seconds - so he has some experience pulling expensive cars apart and putting them back together. I had him help me with the installation.
|It beat my 120 degree F garage in all ways|
We watched videos on YouTube describing the installation, and others showing the disassembly of the 235i. It was still a relatively challenging installation - and took us several attempts. We also broke the retaining clips that hold the fiber optics in on both the original harness and the replacement harness. Probably on the 3rd attempt including reassembling and then taking the dash apart, it seemed like we had it right. It took us some fiddling around with the factory BT settings (disabled) and the BT and WiFi settings on the MMI (enabled) and pairing with the phone, but suddenly Android Auto was appearing on my factory LCD. We buttoned it up. Be aware, on an F20 2 series, the space available to get the MMI and cabling back into the dash is snug. It wasn't easy getting it all shoved back in there.
When I put it in reverse to leave I got an ominous error, "Parking Assist disabled, use caution when reversing". On the drive home, another alert appeared, "Pedestrian Collison and Stability System disabled, drive moderately and contact a service center as soon as possible." That was more concerning. Quickly after appearing, these messages disappeared and I saw no check codes or other alerts on the factory LCD. When I got home, parking assist worked, and I tested reverse and the reverse camera was now working. I turned the car off and went to bed.
The next morning everything was working fine until about 10 minutes into my commute, when the LCD flickered several times and then went black, with a "No Signal" error message. I parked it, and a few hours went out, rebooted my phone, restarted the car, and it started working again. On the drive home, it died again. Waited overnight, and the next morning it was still displaying "No Signal." My alarm was also going off intermittently.
I had been in contact with the support from CarLinkKit immediately. They were quick to respond, even at odd hours, and were reassuring and generally helpful, if sometimes vague. There was also a bit of a language barrier. They wanted video and pictures of the issues I was describing - which seemed kind of pointless to me, but I provided what was asked. They suggested the issue seemed certainly related to either the video cable (LDVS) between either the head-unit and the MMI or the MMI and the LCD, or the fiber optic cables, and asked me to double check those connections.
|This is basically what the MMI looks like from any vendor. The Harness cable is often referred to as the CAN cable. My kit also included two pry-tools to help remove dash panels and connectors.|
It is also worth noting, in the image above the LVDS cable has two ends on one side. The BMW version on has one end on each side. Additionally, you may need to change the positions of certain dip switches depending on your model of BMW and the LCD display size in your car.
It was headed into the weekend, and my friend wasn't readily available to assist me again. Impatient, I didn't want to spend the weekend with a car with no LCD display when that is such an important hub of information on the vehicle. Finally I opened the door between my garage and the house, put a fan in the door, cranked the house AC to 65, and blew cold air into my garage, disconnected the battery and disassembled the dash again myself. Having seen it done, I felt much more confident in trying it myself. It was far less intimidating than I had thought.
My friend had really done all the installation and while he is very good at the mechanical parts of vehicle disassembly, he doesn't have as much experience with PC-type electrical connections and some of the pitfalls and gotchas involved with that. Right away I noticed that the LVDS connector between the MMI and the LCD was backed out just a fraction of a bit, probably about 1/16th of an inch. I pushed firmly and felt the cable slide snugly into its socket with a feeling of a solid connection between cable and connector. I reassembled the dash, reconnected the battery, and the LCD display was back.
I wish I could say that resolved all my problems, but the false alarms remain the sole remaining persistent issue. I think this may be related to when the car is armed, I am near the car but far enough away that it can lose signal to the MMI, and the phone is jumping onto other WiFi signals. Today I armed the car for an 8 hour day in the office, and disabled BT and WiFi on the phone, and I did not have a single false alarm. It will be inconvenient if I have to turn BT and WiFi off/on every time I get in or out of the car - but if it fixes the issue, it is a workaround I am prepared to live with.
The installation instructions provided by Carlinkit are very "Chinesium". They're less clear and detailed than the typical Ikea assembly instructions. The User Operation instructions are even less detailed.
|This is it. Match the numbers on the left to the numbers on the right.|
And of course, now I can use multiple music apps, texting and messaging apps, and navigation apps that are all voice controlled and available at all times. I can also use screen mirroring and launch any app that will run on my Note 10+, including retro emulators, video playback, even Chrome. This requires an additional app installed on your phone, called Autolink, which is available from the Google Play store. This is also not described in the instructions.
I suspect that is a challenge they won't want to take me up on.
Subject: If Not For Double Standards
So, it started with telling us that there are no biological markers for race or ethnicity. We're all one species, and our DNA is all exactly the same - there is *no* reason for our obvious physical differences in facial shape, skin pigment, hair color and texture. It is a social construct that arises from physical differences that have to do with geography and not genetics.
Then they told us that there is no such thing as gender. Gender is a psychological identity and a social construct that has nothing to do with our biological genitalia.
Hmmm... now hold on... I'm pretty sure that...
"Nope, you dislike pink because of society. Not because you have a penis. End of discussion. Misogynist!"
|The Aisle of Objectification and Oppression|
Then they told us sexual preference wasn't just a binary choice, and not even 3 choices - but a *spectrum* - and that there was no such thing as actual heterosexuality. Now, I had always believed that being gay wasn't a *choice*, you were born that way. But evidently being straight *is* a choice, one that is enforced on you by a puritanical heteronormative society that hates LGBTs so much that it has reduced a rainbow of sexual preference that we should all openly enjoy into 2 main choices, straight or gay, and a third choice, "greedy and indiscriminate." Gay, Straight or Bi were not enough to accurately describe a biological female who identifies as a straight man and a biological man who identifies as a gay man who are in a relationship together as a *gay* relationship. One where the biological female who identifies as a male can be a pregnant man carrying the biological child of her and her partner created through regular sexual intercourse. If you had trouble following that - I understand. They are a gay, pansexual couple. I'm pretty sure. I'd have to check the flowchart.
|Not sure where they fit in, but there is a place on the spectrum, for sure.|
At this point - even a lot of LGBTs and Liberals started going - "Guys... I think maybe this is getting out of hand..."
They got called homophobes and told they were just programed by the straight, gay-hating patriarchy.
But then - this happened.
We started telling people that women, PoCs and LGBTs needed better and more representation in media and entertainment. It got to the point where *every* romantic couple on AMC's "The Walking Dead," was either interracial, LGBT, or LGBT interracial. Group Identities that manage to be around 10-15% of the population total became 80% of the population in the fictional, ideal zombie-post-apocalyptic society rebuilding itself from the ashes of the collapsed patriarchy. Straight white heteronormative nuclear traditional families will be GONE after the virus wipes out humanity. This show was, at one time one of the most popular shows in the country, a phenomenon that swept the country - and featured a diverse and compelling cast of characters from the beginning. Once it became a platform exclusively for LGBT diversity, ratings fell off a cliff. But more than that, the "representation" didn't reflect actual societal breakdowns at all. Minorities and LGBTs can't just be better represented - they need to be *over* represented in order to "even things out". This is that "equity not equality," thing that has been going around. It isn't enough to give everyone a box so they can see the infield over the fence - you've got to take the box AWAY from the tallest and give the shortest MORE boxes than anyone else. Equity, not equality, right?
But, little girls, even if they're biologically little boys, should not only have the freedom to define their own gender identity and not have it imposed on them by their homophobic, racist parents - they should have characters they identify with. So should child PoCs. Never mind that they already do - that there is a whole universe of fiction written about powerful black women, powerful gay men, powerful heroes and adventurers and lead characters who are not straight white males. For some reason, those characters never enjoy the fame and popularity of straight white male lead roles.
|But that doesn't mean they weren't bad-asses|
So the only solution is to take those straight white male characters...
And destroy them.
Now, traditionally, all heroes have weaknesses and liabilities and vulnerabilities and strengths, advantages and special abilities. It is what makes characters complex and relatable. At one time the most powerful being in the Marvel COMICS Universe, not to be confused with the Marvel Cinematic Universe - was Jean Gray, Phoenix - a female. But Marvel always painted cautionary tales about being "the most powerful," in the past. It was fraught with risk and temptation and pressure - with hubris that could cause good intentioned evil outcomes, and with the destruction of personal identity while becoming consumed with the manifest power. That is a pretty interesting thing. And several of the most powerful characters in the Marvel Print Universe were females - and they were *loved* by readers.
|Being the Most Powerful Being in the Universe is manageable for her, though.|
But that wasn't enough. The most well known heroes in popular culture, known to all - remained almost exclusively white males. The "Big 4" - Superman, Batman, Spiderman and Wonder Wo... oh... well, she was always super sexualized and objectified and she was white, too... so... you know, whatever. And she is part of the top 4. Everyone knows there is only Win, Place and Show. 4th place doesn't count anyhow...
But even once you get down to the top heroes that aren't as widely known but still the flagship franchises... you get Iron Man, the Hulk, Thor, Captain America. Wolverine is a Johhny-Come-Lately and we'll ignore him and other creations that happened after the Kirby Golden Era of comics or before. Add in every other character in fantasy escapist literature - and you have Luke Skywalker, Han Solo, James Bond... Of course, you've got to ignore the Sara Conners and Ellen Ripleys and Leelo Dallases of the fantasy/fiction genre with this narrative. But again, whatever. The majority of hero archtypes in literature the whole way back to early Greek epics were... ok... the Greek myths had some pretty bad-ass female Goddesses too... but... for the most part - white males have dominated hero archtypes since the start. That is the story, and they're sticking to it.
|Many of you don't know that alcoholic Tony Stark lost it all in the 80s, and a black guy took over for him then, too. It was a compelling story line - but it wasn't done ham-fisted and obviously.|
So. It isn't enough just to create or have popular female fictional characters. They have to make the TOP heroes, the most powerful heroes, the most POPULAR box-office heroes - females, LGBTs and PoCs.
So how do you do that? Well, you do something called a retcon. You change the "canon" of the hero. The easiest way to do that, and it is something we've seen over and over again - is you make the original, white male hero, ultimately a failure. Burned out, bitter, unsuccessful in his personal life, he retires to an apartment where he lives alone as a recluse and starts eating too much and neglecting his role as hero. Spiderman does this in Spider-Man, Into the Spider-Verse. His salvation is passing off his mantle to an extra-dimensional black teen who becomes the *real* Spiderman in his universe when the former one dies.
But we saw Luke turned into a hermit living on an island on a remote uncharted planet, molesting space cows for their blue milk. Bitter and jaded with no desire to be involved in the affairs of the galaxy. We saw Han Solo reverted into a perpetual Peter-Pan complex driven scoundrel, who cheated on Leia, became an absentee parent, and returned to a life of intergalactic crime with a giant walking carpet as his co-pilot. Seems like after his assistance with the Rebellion - that would be a pretty easy description to recognize for someone who wants to be a *smuggling space pirate*... but again, whatever. Thor? Lost his mojo, became fat, drinks, plays video game, and hangs out with loser friends. The Hulk? Wait... isn't he green? Not as Bill Baxter... so he becomes a medley of both characters and becomes an insufferable baizou virtue-signaling Academic muscle head. Even Captain America gives it up and hangs up the shield, having learned that there are others that can wield his shield more effectively than he can. Iron Man simply dies.
And then someone else picks up the mantle. Some one else - a female, is worthy to lift Mjolnir. Captain America's shield will be wielded by a black man. Not sure what will happen to the Hulk - he is still HALF green, after all.
And those that take on the legacy - are *superior* at it. They're more powerful, they're more honorable, they're less imperfect and flawed.
So remember - the reason given for not just cultivating powerful female, PoC and LGBT characters made from whole cloth - but for appropriating already established characters to transform them *into* female, PoC and LGBT characters - is so that females, PoCs and LGBT people have popular characters that they can identify with.
But wait... we've destroyed the legacy of *all* of the straight, white male heroes. What characters will straight white little boys identify with?
Well, evidently they don't *need* those characters to role model the ideal of what they should aspire to be. I guess they can resign themselves to the idea that *they* are destined to fail and become bitter and disappointed in their inability to achieve their goals - or resign themselves to the fact that the only way they can have value to society is by empowering everyone who *isn't* a straight white male. That is how bitter, broken down Peter Parker redeems himself in Into The Spiderverse - and it is also how Haymitch Abernathy redeems himself in the Hunger Games, and how Luke Skywalker redeems himself in the Disney Star Wars trilogy. They pass on what they know to a woman or PoC who is a better person than they were, and then they stand aside once that job is done.
|Get out of the way, flyboy, and let someone competent make the decisions.|
Of course, just like for decades, little girls and PoCs were actually able to identify with and relate to the white male heroes, to enjoy and aspire to be like Batman, Spiderman, and Superman - the little white boys are now free to identify with the female, PoC and LGBT heroes who have replaced them. In fact, because gender, sexual preference and gender identity are all just social constructs -
Wait a minute, once again...
Little girls, PoCs, LGBTs - they need representation, right? But straight little white boys evidently don't need any representation, and it isn't a problem, because being a straight little white boy is just a social construct? Ethnicity is a social construct, remember, so is gender identity, and sexual preference is a *spectrum*. Everyone starts out gay, and society makes them pick a team, except for gay men, who are born that way, they don't make a choice. So... why does representation matter for females, PoCs, LGBTs if it is all a construct, but it *doesn't* matter to straight white males, *because* it is all a social construct? I'm having trouble following when it matters and when it doesn't and why...
Let's be clear - my criticisms of this ideology and its value systems is no reflection on my feelings about media being more representative of minorities. I think there is nothing wrong with communities, cultures or lifestyles writing their own fiction that exclusively features and is targeted toward those specific communities. Written well enough - with human, relatable characters, those "whole-cloth" stories can have considerable crossover appeal. I fully support this. Steven Universe is not written for me, I'm not its demographic. But if someone can get the idea green-lighted, get it produced and published, and find a market for it and make it a success - then this is something that should exist. In fact, maybe Steven Universe is probably the blueprint for what "representation" should look for. Stories written for a specific target market that have little or nothing to offer to those not in that target demographic.
|There is nothing for you here, Boomer, move along.|
The problem is taking He-Man, or The Thundercats, James Bond, or The Lord of the Rings, and re-imagining and recasting it for the specific sake of "inclusivity." If we do it the *other* way around, it gets called "appropriation," and that is a BAD thing. Something we're not allowed to do. Something that is insensitive. But when we make Ariel a little black Mermaid - it is celebrated as progressive and a victory for inclusivity. Let's do it with everything... in fact...
|Let's just recast every character EVER as Idris Elba.|
That'll solve the problem once and for ever.
The contradictions and hypocrisies and double standards in this ideology are so blatant - and yet we've become a society that is uncomfortable even suggesting this is the case - and those in control of the information frequently label it "hate speech," "misogyny" and "racism" if you point out the inconsistencies you see and try and have honest discussions. You're not *allowed* to ask questions about the plot holes in the story you're being told - and if you do - you're perpetuating oppression, hatred and discrimination. They'll shut down your account, they'll try to "cancel" you. If you disagree with them or even question things that don't make sense - you're probably secretly a Nazi - and what the world needs is a female, black, Captain America who is super powered to beat the living snot out of average citizens like you.
|And this is how we get eq-ui-ty!|
Subject: The future of retro gaming
Several months ago, when The Verge ran a major story on MiSTer FPGA, I warned that the consequences to the FPGA and emulation community could be very negative on the MiSTer Discord. I was attacked by so many members of the MiSTer FPGA community for this statement - I quit the Discord channel that day. I knew eventually I'd get to say, "I told you so."
Subject: Re: The future of retro gaming
I got buried and dogpiled for this post on Reddit. The same guys who are all, "We are in an oligarchy and the rich are destroying our society!" got hostile when I suggested that MAYBE Microsoft is not the best steward of the legacy of classic gaming availability.
It boggles my fucking mind, how so many of the people who call you a "bootlicker" when you don't toe their conventional wisdom...
Are cheerleaders FOR the party line when it is a comfort they are used to and enjoy.
It basically comes down to, "I like being able to download classic NES games on my Switch... then paying again to download them AGAIN on the NEXT console I buy from Nintendo..."
It is like the word "Shepple" was invented for this particular fucking generation.
I'm kind of thinking a limited nuclear war between China and the US would be the BEST thing for the rest of the world.
I guess we should each send a few stray nukes into India.
I'd get banned for posting this on any major social media site.
But this is MY voice - my site - so FUCK those guys.
Thu Nov 18 2021 09:08:00 MST from email@example.com (Donovan Colbert) <> Subject: The future of retro gaming
Several months ago, when The Verge ran a major story on MiSTer FPGA, I warned that the consequences to the FPGA and emulation community could be very negative on the MiSTer Discord. I was attacked by so many members of the MiSTer FPGA community for this statement - I quit the Discord channel that day. I knew eventually I'd get to say, "I told you so."
You're not wrong. I'm paying for a subscription to the switch retrogaming because I want to have access to it anywhere I take my machine and it saves me effort. But it would be better the old way.
I also nailed some person who was saying I was invoking Goodwin's Law by saying that the internment happening in Australia right now over Covid is how every other concentration camp or internment camp in history started - and every time we do this, 50 years later or so we end up apologizing and going, "Yeah, so... ok... we kind of over-reacted and maybe participated in some human rights violations... or even genocide. Whoops! Our bad..."
It is true. We've never rounded up a group of people and put them in housing behind chain link fences and later on all of society went, "WOW! Good thing we did THAT! That was so SMART of us!"
Anyhow... so, this person is talking shit and I go, "You hate Trump, you think the US Government is an oligarchy. You think the entire Western Society is an oligarchy. You think we oppress women, and LGBTs and PoCs and every marginalized class in society, and we do it through capitalist economics and Government tyranny. But the minute we start rounding up people because of a virus - you're ready to sign up as one of the prison-camp guards..."
Then I went and read their last 20 posts, and the first post was about how Nestle was using Chinese Slave labor... and every other post was the same kind of shit.
And people HATE it when I *nail* them like that. "You don't know fucking ANYTHING about me..."
20 minutes of searching your metadata and I know ALL about you - but I knew all about you the first paragraph that you wrote (the rhetorical you, TheDave, not the YOU you...)
I'm pretty good at getting high level assumptions about people based on initial impressions pretty accurate - in MOST cases. Not always... but in general.
Mon Nov 29 2021 21:04:01 MST from TheDave
You're not wrong. I'm paying for a subscription to the switch retrogaming because I want to have access to it anywhere I take my machine and it saves me effort. But it would be better the old way.
Subject: Van Halen, David Lee Roth Vs. Sammy Hagar?
Today I read an article over on medium.com asking which was the better Van Halen era, David Lee Roth's or Sammy Hagar's version. You can read that story here:
Without exception, I'm on team Diamond Dave in this debate. But, unlike a lot of people involved in this argument - I think I have an interesting handle on the difference and why people break on one side or the other.
Van Hagar was a more mature band. The subjects, the composition, the lyrics, the genre, all became a little more mainstream and accessible when DLR departed and Sammy Hagar came on board.
Hagar was never my favorite artist, even before he joined Van Halen. He had a handful of hits, including "I Can't Drive 55"... but in general he is one of those artists that you probably love a couple of his songs and don't even realize he is the artist and would have trouble naming those songs. He is like the Multi-Hit-Wonder version of The Outfield and their 1-Hit-Wonder, "Your Love". Everyone knows and loves the song, and almost everyone thinks it is some other artist who recorded it. Maybe Rick Springfield or Bryan Adams? Nope. The Outfield.
Hagar's fans are fanatics though. For those who "get" Hagar, they really get him, and they'll tell you about how many times they've been to Cabo Wabo and how they know him personally and what a great guy he is. I've heard this basic story so many times from so many different die-hard Hagar fans - I believe it must be true.
On the other hand, all the way back in the mid 80's, I used to describe my head-space vision of David Lee Roth as Diamond Dave - sitting on a plastic garden chair in the foyer of an otherwise empty mansion, calling his agent/manager and saying, "I need you to send over a case of Vaseline, 2 African Elephants, and a dozen midgets in high heels, stockings and crotchless body suits..." as he finishes off a bottle of whiskey and a line of coke.
While similar in so many ways, Hagar and Roth are polar opposites at the same time.
The psychoanalysis of this goes much deeper though.
In this article - Sammy Hagar Calls DLR Stage Persona Total Bullshit
Hagar pulls no punches - and I think he gets David Lee Roth right...
|- Sammy Hagar|
David Lee Roth's Van Halen was adolescent, raw, and often seemed to be overcompensating. Which was perfect for the audience demographic Van Halen was after in the very late 70s and early 80s. David Lee Roth is all an act. We've rarely seen glimpses of the real person David Lee Roth is. But whoever that person is, Diamond Dave has always been a costume that Roth puts on to go out in public. Dave Roth conceptualized this character when he was still a very young man - so it is not surprising that the DLR Frontman Stage persona is an adolescent caricature of masculine ideals.
John Hughes, in Breakfast Club - simultaneously captured and butchered the caricature of the High School Rebel youth with the character John Bender. And although Judd Nelson was miscast as this character - he managed to bring the character to life. John Bender is poor, comes from a dysfunctional, abusive and broken family, presents a Zero Fucks Given attitude, exudes raw confidence and an aura of danger and violence - and is - underneath it all, just a scared, broken adolescent boy trying to navigate the road toward becoming a man. The character got all the high school rebel cliques mixed up in a way that best defined John Bender in real world terms as a "poser". He wasn't metal, he wasn't punk, he wasn't really a stoner, or poor white trash. He was a little of all of these mixed in a blender to make a high school rebel everyman. Or everyboy. Whatever.
And for me, it worked - because despite the fashion faux pas that Bender was guilty of - the authenticity of who that character was in the exposition of that character rang true. Hughes captured the ethos and angst of this archetype of adolescence. He nailed the other clique groups, the jock, the nerd, the homecoming queen and the freak pretty spot on. Bender was a little more muddy in execution - but the heart of the character was right.
And Bender would have absolutely been a DLR Van Halen fan. He wouldn't hate Sammy Hagar - he might even like Hagar as a solo artist. But Bender would say that after DLR left and Hagar came on board, Van Halen became a candy-assed mainstream rock band and lost their edge. He wouldn't be wrong.
And I think David Lee Roth would recognize the authenticity of the John Bender character too.
|What is David Lee Roth's Dark Secret, Waldo?|
Roth's Van Halen was edgier, harder, and more juvenile - and it kicks ass. Hagar's Van Halen has song titles that are absent a guitar solo, or that add an unremarkable guitar solo typical of any commercial mainstream rock band.
And that brings us back to Hagar. Hagar is all an act too. His whole "Laid Back Coastal Baja Cabo Beach Bum Spud McKenzie Party Animal" schtick is Hagar Marketing 101. I worked with a guy at Intel who was from Southern California - had long hair, wore khaki shorts and Hawaiian shirts and leather sandals and called people "kooks" (surfer speak for a noob surfer who annoys experienced ones). He smoked some weed, and pretended he was a mellow SoCal surf brah... but - he was really a highly-wound, slightly neurotic, pretty competitive & typically ambitious Northern California IT worker in disguise - just wearing a costume. That dude reminded me of Sammy Hagar. Pretending he was laid back and chill - but really, his eye was always on the prize and the "laid back surfer" thing was kind of like Drunken Style Kung Fu... it was supposed to make you dismiss him as a threat, the better for him to be a threat. He wasn't a party animal - he was actually one of the most conservative and reserved members of the team we were on. His laid-back persona made people relax around him - and that gave him an advantage. It was the buttoned down frat-guy who had graduated IS from Chico or Stanford who ended up puking by the side of the restaurant after a team building exercise - not the laid-back surfer-stoner guy from L.A. Because Laid-Back Surfer dude was all a ruse.
Sammy Hagar strikes me as this way. His whole hard-rockin, fast living, hard-partying thing is mostly a mythology - as completely as David Lee Roth's worldy uber-confident super-cool lady's man persona is a fabrication. The difference is, Hagar's stage persona is calculated and intentionally self-aware. David Lee Roth's is more of a defense mechanism.
|Party hard with me. I accept Visa, MC, Discover and Amex! Don't skip the gift shop!|
I think Sammy Hagar wouldn't really get the character of John Bender - because Sammy Hagar has always been conning and hustling and being amicable to everyone to get along. Hagar charms and smoozes and blows sunshine up your ass when there is a chance that you might be part of his roadmap. He is always amicable and friendly and generous and agreeable. David Lee Roth's approach is to make you think HE is the most interesting thing around to cover for his insecurities. Sammy Hagar's it to make you think you are, to exploit yours. David wants to get you to stroke HIS ego, and Sammy knows he gets WAY more mileage out of stroking yours. Sammy is the guy at the party that doesn't mind letting go, but he is always making sure he is letting go just a little less than you are.
And the results speak for themselves. Van Halen was a huge band, loved and adored by fans within the clique of hard rock and metal as they emerged into bona fide genres in the early 80s.
But Van Hagar's sales and numbers eclipse pre-Hagar Van Halen numbers - despite the fact that the hardest rocking, most kick-ass parts of the Van Halen catalog absolutely came before Hagar joined the lineup. The MEGAHITS with huge radio play crossover appeal though - those all dropped when Sammy and Eddie collaborated and took the band in a far more commercially accessible direction. Van Hagar was far more commercially successful than DLR Van Halen.
And there is nothing wrong with this. Van Halen cashed in with Hagar and made some incredible mainstream commercial rock songs and ballads. The music matured, the artistry of the songs, the production, the arrangement of the tracks on the albums - everything became very slick and consumer friendly during the Van Hagar era. The videos became more adult - filmed in black and white, less over-the-top, no flashy sequins and neon and primary colors. Almost somber - something that I don't know if David Lee Roth's Van Halen could have ever pulled off. It was probably the right move. Metallica was slowly maturing their act and stage presence, and all the cartoon hair-bands and over-the-top speed metal bands were falling off the face of the Earth as Grunge started rolling in and dominating the adolescent angst music scene. It was probably the smartest choice Eddie ever made.
And Van Hagar has some great, easy listening rock tunes that are pretty classic. The video for Right Now is a masterpiece whereas Hot For Teacher and Panama and Jump are all... well... they're all cartoons. Van Hagar is rock you can listen to while you watch the kids at soccer practice with the other Soccer Moms & Dads. DLR Van Halen is what you put on the shuffle when you're with the guys on a trip to Vegas. DLR Van Halen is music you skipped school and skipped school and smoked joints in the park to when you were in 9th grade. Sammy Hagar's Van Halen is music you put on when you're driving with your wife to camp in Utah. It isn't bad - it is actually the perfect music in those kind of cases.
But I wouldn't say it ever really approaches "kicking ass". If you want kick-ass rock from Van Halen - you're going to pick an album from the DLR era. Bottom line.
Yeah, I think you're spot on.
Yeah - there was a whole part there about how I get Bender because I lived Bender's life - and that is part of why I can so clearly see the difference between a persona or façade designed to hide insecurity versus the kind that plays at being the devil-may-care rebel while really just exploiting those that surround it. There have always been guys in the scenes I've been in like that - they're there to party and partake - but they're also a little arrogant about the whole thing, usually. They look *down* on the people who are self destructive and really buying into the "rock and roll lifestyle"... They'll act like they adopt the "live for today, life fast, die young and leave a pretty corpse," - but they intend to die old, worn out, and comfortable the entire time.
So - yeah, Sammy Hagar calling out DLR for being all stage personality just seems a little self-unaware how transparent he is himself, to me.